🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "robbing our children's youth". The policy could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the state level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others show that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.